opswat.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users
Headquartered in United StatesHeadquarters countrySourced only from this vendor's own published headquarters address (schema.org structured data on their site) — never guessed from domain TLD. Source ↗
2 of 5 independent trust signals established
OPSWAT has 2 dimensions with established evidence. The rest have not been confirmed yet.
Not yet established: Independently verified · Disclosure posture · Momentum
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.
Is this a real, durable business?
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Integrated by: Blink Ops, D3 Security, IRONSCALES, Nile Secure, OctoXLabs
No buyer reviews yet.
No ratings in this window yet.
Critical-infrastructure and OT protection on the MetaDefender platform: file security/CDR, OT security, industrial firewall, optical diode, and network access control. AI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
Infrastructure & transparency signals
An issue in OPSWAT AppRemover Driver (ardrv.sys) v2017.10.02.1551 and earlier in IOCTL handler 0x2420031. Any local user can open the device and send process termination requests without privilege val…
An incorrect privilege management vulnerability in the OPSWAT MetaDefender Endpoint Security SDK used by the Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect™ app on Windows devices allows a locally authenticated non…
In OPSWAT MetaDefender Kiosk before 4.7.0, arbitrary code execution can be performed by an attacker via the MD Kiosk Unlock Device feature for software encrypted USB drives.
Product information on this page is auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public sources and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst, unless an item is individually labelled otherwise. How trust works →
What do they do when something goes wrong?
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?
How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.
Are they still shipping, or coasting?
Whether this vendor is visibly still building.
Opswat Metadefender Core before 5.2.1 does not properly defend against potential HTML injection and XSS attacks.
An issue was discovered in OPSWAT MetaDefender KIOSK 4.6.1.9996. Long inputs were not properly processed, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (loss of communication).
An issue was discovered in OPSWAT MetaDefender KIOSK 4.6.1.9996. Built-in features of Windows (desktop shortcuts, narrator) can be abused for privilege escalation.
An issue was discovered in OPSWAT MetaDefender KIOSK 4.6.1.9996. It has an unquoted service path that can be abused locally.
A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in OPSWAT MetaDefender ICAP Server before 4.13.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript or HTML because of the blocked page response.
OPSWAT MetaDefender Core before 5.1.2, MetaDefender ICAP before 4.12.1, and MetaDefender Email Gateway Security before 5.6.1 have incorrect access control, resulting in privilege escalation.
As a result of an observable discrepancy in returned messages, OPSWAT MetaDefender Core (MDCore) before 5.1.2 could allow an authenticated user to enumerate filenames on the server.
OPSWAT MetaDefender before v4.11.2 allows CSV injection.