Start from a neutral baseline and add what matters to you. Criteria are labeled by source — the platform baseline is architecture-neutral; buyer-contributed criteria are shown separately.
Build your evaluation
no account needed
Match on your requirements
no account needed
This evaluation is stored in your browser only. We cannot see it, and it is not tied to any account. Save it to a link or create an account to keep it across devices — you can export it at any time either way.
1. Weight what matters
31 criteria
baselineDoes the product support agentless deployment?
baselineWhat is the measured agent CPU overhead under load?
baselineWhich operating systems and workload types (Windows, macOS, Linux, mobile, containers) does the endpoint agent support, and where do prevention, EDR telemetry, or response actions differ by platform?
baselineHow does the product combine prevention (NGAV) with detection and response (EDR) in a single agent, and can prevention operate fully offline?
baselineDescribe automated and analyst-guided response actions (host isolation, process kill, ransomware rollback/remediation), and quantify mean time to contain using customer references.
baselineDoes the platform extend to XDR (identity, cloud, email, network telemetry), and is that extension first-party/native or delivered through integrations?
baselineWhat managed detection and response (MDR) options are available, including coverage hours, escalation paths, and the scope of active remediation your analysts will perform?
baselineHow is endpoint telemetry retained and queried for threat hunting (default and maximum retention window, query interface/language, and data-residency options)?
baselineDetail deployment and operational overhead: agent footprint, update mechanism, and measured performance impact, citing independent or customer-validated figures.
baselineWhat identity- and ransomware-specific protections are included (credential-theft/ITDR detection, ransomware rollback, decryption support), and what are their limits?
baselineWhat threat intelligence sources feed detection logic (proprietary research team, open-source feeds, telemetry-derived from the vendor's own customer base), and how frequently are new IOCs/IOAs pushed to deployed agents?
baselineDescribe tamper protection and self-defense mechanisms against attackers attempting to disable or uninstall the EDR agent itself, and cite independent validation (e.g., MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations) or a real incident where tamper protection held.
baselineHow does endpoint protection extend to cloud workloads and servers specifically (versus traditional desktop/laptop endpoints) — is it the same agent/policy engine or a materially different product for server/cloud workloads?
baselineProvide the vendor's most recent independent test results (MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations, AV-Comparatives, SE Labs) with specific detection/protection scores, and explain any material gaps or missed techniques in those results.
baselineWhat is the measured false-positive rate in production deployments, and what tuning/whitelisting workload does a typical SOC team face in the first 90 days after deployment?
baselineExplain the pricing model per endpoint across tiers (prevention-only vs. full EDR vs. MDR-included), and provide a total cost example for a defined fleet size (e.g., 1,000 endpoints) including any required add-ons for full functionality.
baselineWhat data export and SIEM integration depth is offered — raw telemetry export (not just alerts), supported export formats, and whether export incurs additional data-egress costs.
baselineIs a named incident-response retainer or breach-coach service available as part of the product or as an add-on, what are its response-time SLAs, and how many active incidents has that team handled in the past 12 months?
baselineProvide virus protection administration.
baselineManage all detection, response, and tuning activities within the agency's tenant, delivering Tier 1 endpoint detection, containment, and remediation services, with all telemetry, rules, alerts, playbooks, and configurations residing within the tenant for portability and continuity.
baselineProvide 24x7x365 monitoring, triage, containment, and remediation of endpoint threats using Microsoft Defender and related tools, with clearly defined escalation paths for Tier 2+ incidents; may propose optional Tier 2 capabilities such as advanced investigation, threat hunting, or root cause analysis.
baselineEnroll all in-scope Windows 11 endpoints for up to 2,500 users into Microsoft Defender for Endpoint using Microsoft Intune or alternative methods, and validate telemetry flow into Microsoft Sentinel.
baselineProvide endpoint monitoring detection for multiple device types including physical/virtual Windows/Linux servers, network appliances/devices, PCs, laptops, and tablets.
baselineProvide a user-friendly dashboard to monitor endpoint threats across multiple data centers and virtual private cloud environments.
baselineThe financial institution's client machines do not require direct integration with, or installation of, SIEM agents; visibility into these endpoints will instead be achieved through integration of centralized Antivirus, XDR/EDR, and DLP solutions across approximately 4,000 client machines — confirm the proposed SIEM's ability to ingest telemetry from these existing centralized AV/XDR/EDR/DLP tools rather than deploying its own agents.
baselineThe Platform should (optionally) support integration of the EDR platform provided by the financial institution for endpoint threat hunting (process/service anomalies, hash values, connection anomalies), forensic artifact collection/matching against known IOCs, and quick response actions such as killing anomalous processes, deleting malicious binaries, and isolating endpoints.
baselineProposer must describe how it will handle log sources across the agency's ~2,500 users and ~3,000 endpoints (all enrolled in EDR, 70% Windows/30% mobile), integrating with M365 E5-licensed platforms (Defender for Endpoint/Identity/Office 365, Azure AD/Entra ID, Defender for Cloud) at an estimated ingestion volume of 100GB/day.
baselineTask Area 3: Contractor shall support administration, configuration, sustainment, enhancement and optimization of SIEM-related capabilities, including onboarding/integrating new data sources, normalizing/validating telemetry, tuning alerts/rules, and supporting correlation logic; conduct detection refinement (tuning SIEM rules, EDR alerts, WAF/CDN policies) and continuously validate telemetry from sources including Zscaler SASE and Microsoft Defender, identifying/correcting configuration drift.
baselineZero Trust Phase 1: Contractor shall complete rollout/operationalization of the Microsoft 365 security suite including Microsoft Intune (device health/UEM), Defender for Endpoint (EDR/XDR), Microsoft Purview (DLP and sensitive data risk assessments), Mobile Access (ZTNA + Intune MAM), and Privileged Access Management (PAM) implementation using platforms including CyberArk, Microsoft Entra PIM, or Okta.
baselineSecondary Red Team objectives: establish persistent access and maintain stealth, lateral movement across network segments/geographic boundaries, privilege escalation to critical administrative roles, exfiltration of sensitive data without detection, and bypassing of security controls (EDR, SIEM, DLP, MFA).
baselineDescribe your virus detection methods and software.
Signing up adds sharing with your team, sending this as an RFP to vendors, and private document sharing. Nothing above is taken away, and nothing here is sent anywhere until you choose to.
Platform baseline
neutral · staff-reviewed
Does the product support agentless deployment?
What is the measured agent CPU overhead under load?
RFIWhich operating systems and workload types (Windows, macOS, Linux, mobile, containers) does the endpoint agent support, and where do prevention, EDR telemetry, or response actions differ by platform?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
A strong answer enumerates per-OS feature parity across prevention, detection telemetry, and response, and openly discloses where coverage is reduced (e.g., limited Linux response or mobile EDR). Watch for 'supported' claims that cover install but not full response.
RFIHow does the product combine prevention (NGAV) with detection and response (EDR) in a single agent, and can prevention operate fully offline?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Look for one agent delivering NGAV + EDR, documented on-sensor/offline prevention, and the ML model update cadence. Be cautious of cloud-only detection that degrades when disconnected.
RFPDescribe automated and analyst-guided response actions (host isolation, process kill, ransomware rollback/remediation), and quantify mean time to contain using customer references.Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Evidence-backed answers list specific response primitives, state ransomware rollback scope (OS and file types) if any, and quantify containment with named customer references rather than marketing figures.
How vendors compare
balanced · vendor-sourced
Neutral strengths and gaps for each vendor in this category, drawn from vendors' own public materials — included so the questions above favor no single vendor. Gaps reflect capabilities not emphasized in public materials, not rankings.
Vendor
Strengths
Gaps / watch-outs
BitdefenderAI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →(source)
GravityZone builds on strong prevention/AV heritage with a single management console and EDR/XDR tiers.
Public business product page surfaces little detail programmatically; EDR-specific telemetry depth is documented elsewhere.
CrowdStrikeAI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.
From other buyers
crowdsourced · anonymized
💬
No buyer-contributed criteria yet
Verified buyers can suggest criteria (anonymized before pooling).
RFIDoes the platform extend to XDR (identity, cloud, email, network telemetry), and is that extension first-party/native or delivered through integrations?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Strong answers clarify which additional domains are native vs integration, and the licensing boundary for each. Distinguish a true unified data model from a federation of separately licensed modules.
RFPWhat managed detection and response (MDR) options are available, including coverage hours, escalation paths, and the scope of active remediation your analysts will perform?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Look for clearly tiered MDR, 24x7 coverage, explicit remediation authority, and SLAs. Distinguish self-managed alerting from fully managed response that takes action on the customer's behalf.
RFIHow is endpoint telemetry retained and queried for threat hunting (default and maximum retention window, query interface/language, and data-residency options)?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Strong answers state default and maximum retention, the hunting query interface, and data-residency/region controls. Note where longer retention is a paid add-on.
RFPDetail deployment and operational overhead: agent footprint, update mechanism, and measured performance impact, citing independent or customer-validated figures.Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Prefer answers citing independent or customer-validated CPU/memory/boot-impact figures and a single-agent architecture over vendor-only benchmarks. Probe reboot requirements and update disruption.
RFIWhat identity- and ransomware-specific protections are included (credential-theft/ITDR detection, ransomware rollback, decryption support), and what are their limits?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Look for documented credential-theft/ITDR detection and ransomware rollback scope (covered OS and file types), plus honest statement of limits. Treat 'guaranteed' recovery claims skeptically.
RFIWhat threat intelligence sources feed detection logic (proprietary research team, open-source feeds, telemetry-derived from the vendor's own customer base), and how frequently are new IOCs/IOAs pushed to deployed agents?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Strong answers name real sources and a concrete push cadence (hours, not weeks); vendors relying solely on generic open-source feeds offer weaker, slower-to-update protection.
RFPDescribe tamper protection and self-defense mechanisms against attackers attempting to disable or uninstall the EDR agent itself, and cite independent validation (e.g., MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations) or a real incident where tamper protection held.Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Look for concrete technical self-defense mechanisms (kernel-level protection, tamper-alerting) plus independent test evidence, not just a marketing claim of 'tamper-resistant.'
RFIHow does endpoint protection extend to cloud workloads and servers specifically (versus traditional desktop/laptop endpoints) — is it the same agent/policy engine or a materially different product for server/cloud workloads?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
A unified agent/policy model across endpoint types is stronger operationally than requiring separate products with separate management consoles for servers versus desktops.
RFPProvide the vendor's most recent independent test results (MITRE ATT&CK Evaluations, AV-Comparatives, SE Labs) with specific detection/protection scores, and explain any material gaps or missed techniques in those results.Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Strong answers cite specific, recent, named test results and are honest about gaps — a vendor who can't produce specific scores or only cites vague 'top rated' claims should raise concern.
RFIWhat is the measured false-positive rate in production deployments, and what tuning/whitelisting workload does a typical SOC team face in the first 90 days after deployment?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Look for a real customer-validated false-positive figure and an honest description of the tuning burden — 'zero false positives out of the box' is not a credible claim.
RFPExplain the pricing model per endpoint across tiers (prevention-only vs. full EDR vs. MDR-included), and provide a total cost example for a defined fleet size (e.g., 1,000 endpoints) including any required add-ons for full functionality.Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Strong answers give transparent per-tier, per-endpoint economics and disclose which capabilities are gated behind higher tiers rather than bundled in the base price.
RFIWhat data export and SIEM integration depth is offered — raw telemetry export (not just alerts), supported export formats, and whether export incurs additional data-egress costs.Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Full raw-telemetry export (not just summarized alerts) is materially more useful for a mature SOC's own detection engineering, and hidden egress costs are a common pricing trap to probe.
RFIIs a named incident-response retainer or breach-coach service available as part of the product or as an add-on, what are its response-time SLAs, and how many active incidents has that team handled in the past 12 months?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Strong answers cite a concrete SLA and a real recent incident-volume figure, demonstrating the IR team is actively used, not a paper offering.
RFPProvide virus protection administration.
RFPManage all detection, response, and tuning activities within the agency's tenant, delivering Tier 1 endpoint detection, containment, and remediation services, with all telemetry, rules, alerts, playbooks, and configurations residing within the tenant for portability and continuity.
RFPProvide 24x7x365 monitoring, triage, containment, and remediation of endpoint threats using Microsoft Defender and related tools, with clearly defined escalation paths for Tier 2+ incidents; may propose optional Tier 2 capabilities such as advanced investigation, threat hunting, or root cause analysis.
RFPEnroll all in-scope Windows 11 endpoints for up to 2,500 users into Microsoft Defender for Endpoint using Microsoft Intune or alternative methods, and validate telemetry flow into Microsoft Sentinel.
RFPProvide endpoint monitoring detection for multiple device types including physical/virtual Windows/Linux servers, network appliances/devices, PCs, laptops, and tablets.
RFPProvide a user-friendly dashboard to monitor endpoint threats across multiple data centers and virtual private cloud environments.
RFPThe financial institution's client machines do not require direct integration with, or installation of, SIEM agents; visibility into these endpoints will instead be achieved through integration of centralized Antivirus, XDR/EDR, and DLP solutions across approximately 4,000 client machines — confirm the proposed SIEM's ability to ingest telemetry from these existing centralized AV/XDR/EDR/DLP tools rather than deploying its own agents.
RFPThe Platform should (optionally) support integration of the EDR platform provided by the financial institution for endpoint threat hunting (process/service anomalies, hash values, connection anomalies), forensic artifact collection/matching against known IOCs, and quick response actions such as killing anomalous processes, deleting malicious binaries, and isolating endpoints.
RFPProposer must describe how it will handle log sources across the agency's ~2,500 users and ~3,000 endpoints (all enrolled in EDR, 70% Windows/30% mobile), integrating with M365 E5-licensed platforms (Defender for Endpoint/Identity/Office 365, Azure AD/Entra ID, Defender for Cloud) at an estimated ingestion volume of 100GB/day.
RFPTask Area 3: Contractor shall support administration, configuration, sustainment, enhancement and optimization of SIEM-related capabilities, including onboarding/integrating new data sources, normalizing/validating telemetry, tuning alerts/rules, and supporting correlation logic; conduct detection refinement (tuning SIEM rules, EDR alerts, WAF/CDN policies) and continuously validate telemetry from sources including Zscaler SASE and Microsoft Defender, identifying/correcting configuration drift.
RFPZero Trust Phase 1: Contractor shall complete rollout/operationalization of the Microsoft 365 security suite including Microsoft Intune (device health/UEM), Defender for Endpoint (EDR/XDR), Microsoft Purview (DLP and sensitive data risk assessments), Mobile Access (ZTNA + Intune MAM), and Privileged Access Management (PAM) implementation using platforms including CyberArk, Microsoft Entra PIM, or Okta.
RFPSecondary Red Team objectives: establish persistent access and maintain stealth, lateral movement across network segments/geographic boundaries, privilege escalation to critical administrative roles, exfiltration of sensitive data without detection, and bypassing of security controls (EDR, SIEM, DLP, MFA).
RFPDescribe your virus detection methods and software.
Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.
Cloud-native single-agent NGAV+EDR with broad add-on modules (identity protection, threat intelligence, next-gen SIEM) on one console.
Value spans many separately-licensed modules; the public product page emphasizes platform breadth over per-OS response specifics.
CybereasonAI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →(source)
MalOp correlation unifies NGAV, EDR, and XDR with strong threat-hunting and DFIR positioning.
Public page emphasizes the operation-centric platform; MDR tiers and per-OS parity are documented elsewhere.
CynetAI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →(source)
All-in-one platform (NGAV/EDR/XDR plus identity, network, SaaS, and 24x7 CyOps MDR) suited to lean security teams.
Consolidation can trade depth for breadth; large-enterprise scale and tuning specifics are less emphasized publicly.
FortinetAI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →(source)
FortiEDR offers real-time response and tight integration with the Fortinet Security Fabric.
Best value is realized within the Fortinet ecosystem; standalone EDR positioning is less prominent than network security.
MicrosoftAI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →(source)
Deep Windows and Microsoft 365 integration, EDR plus XDR, and bundling within E5 licensing.
Full value is tied to Microsoft licensing and ecosystem; cross-platform (macOS/Linux) parity is emphasized less.
Palo Alto NetworksAI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →(source)
Cortex XDR correlates endpoint, network, and cloud telemetry with strong analytics and automation.
Positioned as an XDR suite; standalone endpoint-only EDR specifics are emphasized less than the broader platform.
SentinelOneAI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →(source)
Autonomous on-agent prevention and response with ransomware rollback and native XDR across endpoint, cloud, and identity.
Public materials emphasize automation; depth of fully-managed (analyst-led) response is detailed less than the self-driving capabilities.
SophosAI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →(source)
Broad managed-security portfolio (Intercept X endpoint, MDR, firewall, email) with mature MDR coverage.
Standalone EDR depth is blended into managed services; buyers wanting unmanaged EDR must separate the layers.
TrellixAI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →(source)
Broad endpoint and XDR portfolio combining McAfee Enterprise and FireEye heritage.
Post-merger portfolio integration and product naming can make scoping and parity assessment harder.
Trend MicroAI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →(source)
Trend Vision One XDR with long endpoint heritage (Apex One) spanning endpoint, email, and cloud.
Public product pages are difficult to access programmatically; portfolio breadth can complicate scoping a focused EDR purchase.
