FileCloud, founded in 2010, provides secure enterprise file sharing, sync, and content collaboration with built-in data governance and compliance features. AI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
Tools & products
Showing the 12 closest of 143 — .
Integrates with: Alibaba Cloud ↗, Centrify ↗, Egnyte ↗, Elastic ↗, Everfox ↗, Google ↗, JumpCloud ↗, McAfee ↗
1 of 5 independent trust signals established
FileCloud has one dimension with established evidence. The rest have not been confirmed yet.
Not yet established: Independently verified · Behaviour under stress · Disclosure posture · Momentum
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
1 independent source(s) corroborate this vendor's claims.
Is this a real, durable business?
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
Certifications & compliance claimsWhat the tiers meanVerified in a public registry — we confirmed this against an authoritative public registry (FedRAMP Marketplace, CSA STAR) and re-check it by the registry's own identifier. Stated by the vendor — the vendor says it on a page they control; a sourced claim about themselves, not an independent check. Detected on a page — found during automated enrichment, neither registry-confirmed nor stated on the vendor's own site.
Some certifications have no public registry at all — SOC 2 and HIPAA among them. For those, “not registry-verified” is not a shortfall and means nothing about the vendor.
Detected on a page
Security headers (4/5) — checked 10/18/2026
1 CVE has an estimated 10%-or-higher chance of having already been exploited despite not appearing on CISA's KEV catalog. KEV is a curated record of confirmed cases rather than a complete census, so this is where its coverage is likely thinnest — an estimate from EPSS history, not a finding. Based on a median of 2 EPSS observations per CVE.
Likely-exploited estimates here rest on a median of 2 EPSS observations per CVE — too little history to read as a trend yet. It deepens daily as scores are collected.
A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Send for Approval function of FileCloud v23.241.2 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload.
FileCloud Versions 20.2 and later allows remote attackers to potentially cause unauthorized remote code execution and access to reported API endpoints via a crafted HTTP request.
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Datasheets, whitepapers, and case studies found on filecloud.com by the enrichment loop. Links open the original documents on the vendor's own site.
Product information on this page is auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public sources and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst, unless an item is individually labelled otherwise. How trust works →
Integrated by: Votiro
What do they do when something goes wrong?
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?
How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.
Are they still shipping, or coasting?
Whether this vendor is visibly still building.
Infrastructure & transparency signals
In FileCloud before 21.3, the CSV user import functionality is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
FileCloud Versions 20.2 and later allows remote attackers to potentially cause unauthorized remote code execution and access to reported API endpoints via a cra…
CodeLathe FileCloud before 20.2.0.11915 allows username enumeration.
CodeLathe FileCloud, version 13.0.0.32841 and earlier, contains a global cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. An attacker can perform actions with t…
All versions of FileCloud prior to 21.3 are vulnerable to user enumeration. The vulnerability exists in the parameter "path" passing "/SHARED/<username>". A mal…
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in FileCloud. Affected is an unknown function of the component NTFS Handler. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. It is possible to…
All versions of FileCloud prior to 21.3 are vulnerable to user enumeration. The vulnerability exists in the parameter "path" passing "/SHARED/<username>". A malicious actor could identify the existenc…
In FileCloud before 21.3, file upload is not protected against Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
In FileCloud before 21.3, the CSV user import functionality is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
CodeLathe FileCloud before 20.2.0.11915 allows username enumeration.
CodeLathe FileCloud, version 13.0.0.32841 and earlier, contains a global cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. An attacker can perform actions with the same permissions as a victim user, pr…