AnonymousSign in
sharefile.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users
1 of 5 independent trust signals established
ShareFile has one dimension with established evidence. The rest have not been confirmed yet.
Not yet established: Independently verified · Operating durability · Disclosure posture · Momentum
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
1 independent source(s) corroborate this vendor's claims.
Is this a real, durable business?
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
What do they do when something goes wrong?
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Integrates with: Google ↗, Microsoft ↗
Integrated by: CrowdStrike, Optimal IdM, Safe Security
No buyer reviews yet.
No ratings in this window yet.
Secure file sharing platform with access controls and threat detection AI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
Certifications & compliance claimsWhat the tiers meanVerified in a public registry — we confirmed this against an authoritative public registry (FedRAMP Marketplace, CSA STAR) and re-check it by the registry's own identifier. Stated by the vendor — the vendor says it on a page they control; a sourced claim about themselves, not an independent check. Detected on a page — found during automated enrichment, neither registry-confirmed nor stated on the vendor's own site.
Some certifications have no public registry at all — SOC 2 and HIPAA among them. For those, “not registry-verified” is not a shortfall and means nothing about the vendor.
Detected on a page
Some of these (SOC 2, HIPAA and similar) have no public registry, so no one can independently verify them — that is a fact about the framework, not about this vendor.
No outages recorded since we started watching (first checked Aug 14, 2026, 5:49 AM).
In Progress ShareFile Storage Zones Controller versions <= 5.12.5 and <= 6.0.2, an authenticated zone administrator can exploit improper validation in the download preparation flow, enabling attacker-…
In Progress ShareFile Storage Zones Controller v5.12.5 and below versions, unsafe deserialization of untrusted file metadata can allow a user with write access to a Network share to execute arbitrary …
Product information on this page is auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public sources and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst, unless an item is individually labelled otherwise. How trust works →
Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?
How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.
Are they still shipping, or coasting?
Whether this vendor is visibly still building.
Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against ShareFile.
Security headers (4/5) — checked 8/14/2026
Infrastructure & transparency signals
In Progress ShareFile Storage Zones Controller v5.12.5 and below, a party with valid zone credentials can perform path traversal using resumable upload initiation endpoint, allowing the party to write…
In Progress ShareFile Storage Zones Controller versions prior to 5.12.5 and 6.0.2, an authenticated administrative user can exploit a path traversal vulnerability to read arbitrary files from the serv…
Customer Managed ShareFile Storage Zones Controller (SZC) allows an unauthenticated attacker to access restricted configuration pages. This leads to changing system configuration and potential remote …
A vulnerability has been discovered in the customer-managed ShareFile storage zones controller which, if exploited, could allow an unauthenticated attacker to remotely compromise the customer-managed …
Improper Access Control in Citrix ShareFile storage zones controller before 5.11.20 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to remotely compromise the storage zones controller.
An issue has been identified in the CTX269106 mitigation tool for Citrix ShareFile storage zones controller which causes the ShareFile file encryption option to become disabled if it had previously be…
A missing authorization vulnerability exists in Citrix ShareFile Storage Zones Controller before 5.7.3, 5.8.3, 5.9.3, 5.10.1 and 5.11.18 may allow unauthenticated remote compromise of the Storage Zone…
An arbitrary file write issue exists in all versions of Citrix ShareFile StorageZones (aka storage zones) Controller, including the most recent 5.10.x releases as of May 2020, which allows remote code…
An unauthenticated arbitrary file read issue exists in all versions of Citrix ShareFile StorageZones (aka storage zones) Controller, including the most recent 5.10.x releases as of May 2020. RCE and f…
In certain situations, all versions of Citrix ShareFile StorageZones (aka storage zones) Controller, including the most recent 5.10.x releases as of May 2020, allow unauthenticated attackers to access…
Citrix ShareFile before 19.23 allows a downgrade from two-factor authentication to one-factor authentication. An attacker with access to the offline victim's otp physical token or virtual app (like go…
Citrix ShareFile before 19.12 allows User Enumeration. It is possible to enumerate application username based on different server responses using the request to check the otp code. No authentication i…
Citrix ShareFile StorageZones Controller before 5.4.2 has Information Exposure Through an Error Message.
Citrix ShareFile StorageZones Controller before 5.4.2 allows Directory Traversal.
Citrix ShareFile Mobile and ShareFile Mobile for Tablets before 2.4.4 for Android do not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allow man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain…