Represented by Carahsoft ↗, Exclusive Networks ↗
Cloud-based enterprise data backup and recovery with encryption and security AI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
Tools & products
We build profiles from public sources and haven't extracted a capability list for Druva. Closest sources we do hold:
Showing the 12 closest of 36 — see all.
Integrated by: Compyl, CrowdStrike, D3 Security, Nudge Security, Nutanix, Obsidian Security, Oleria, Oomnitza, Seceon Inc, Seraphic, ThreatAware, WitFoo
1 of 5 independent trust signals established
Druva has one dimension with established evidence. The rest have not been confirmed yet.
Not yet established: Independently verified · Behaviour under stress · Disclosure posture · Momentum
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
1 independent source(s) corroborate this vendor's claims.
Certifications & compliance claimsWhat the tiers meanVerified in a public registry — we confirmed this against an authoritative public registry (FedRAMP Marketplace, CSA STAR) and re-check it by the registry's own identifier. Stated by the vendor — the vendor says it on a page they control; a sourced claim about themselves, not an independent check. Detected on a page — found during automated enrichment, neither registry-confirmed nor stated on the vendor's own site.
Some certifications have no public registry at all — SOC 2 and HIPAA among them. For those, “not registry-verified” is not a shortfall and means nothing about the vendor.
Stated by the vendor
1 CVE has an estimated 10%-or-higher chance of having already been exploited despite not appearing on CISA's KEV catalog. KEV is a curated record of confirmed cases rather than a complete census, so this is where its coverage is likely thinnest — an estimate from EPSS history, not a finding. Based on a median of 2 EPSS observations per CVE.
Likely-exploited estimates here rest on a median of 2 EPSS observations per CVE — too little history to read as a trend yet. It deepens daily as scores are collected.
Command injection vulnerability in Druva inSync 6.9.0 for MacOS, allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via crafted payload to the local HTTP server due to un-sanitized call to the python os.s…
An issue was discovered in Druva 6.9.0 for MacOS, allows attackers to gain escalated local privileges via the inSyncDecommission.
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Product information on this page is auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public sources and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst, unless an item is individually labelled otherwise. How trust works →
Is this a real, durable business?
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
What do they do when something goes wrong?
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?
How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.
Are they still shipping, or coasting?
Whether this vendor is visibly still building.
Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Druva.
Some of these (SOC 2, HIPAA and similar) have no public registry, so no one can independently verify them — that is a fact about the framework, not about this vendor.
Security headers (4/5) — checked 9/9/2026
Infrastructure & transparency signals
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command in Druva inSync Windows Client 6.5.0 allows a local, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbit…
Relative path traversal in Druva inSync Windows Client 6.6.3 allows a local, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands with SYSTEM…
Command injection vulnerability in Druva inSync 6.9.0 for MacOS, allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via crafted payload to the local HTTP server due…
Improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code in Druva inSync Mac OS Client 6.5.0 allows a local, authenticated attacker to execute arbitr…
Improper input validation in Druva inSync Client 6.5.0 allows a local, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary NodeJS code.
An issue was discovered in Druva 6.9.0 for macOS, allows attackers to gain escalated local privileges via the inSyncUpgradeDaemon.
Relative path traversal in Druva inSync Windows Client 6.6.3 allows a local, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands with SYSTEM privileges.
Improper input validation in Druva inSync Client 6.5.0 allows a local, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary NodeJS code.
Improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code in Druva inSync Mac OS Client 6.5.0 allows a local, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary Python expressions with root privile…
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command in Druva inSync Windows Client 6.5.0 allows a local, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands with SYST…