SaaS security and governance: shadow AI/SaaS discovery, SSPM, AI governance, third-party risk, and SaaS sprawl management. AI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
Tools & products
Drawn from this vendor's own public materials and authored to keep category questionnaires balanced. Gaps reflect capabilities not emphasized in public materials, not rankings.
Strengths: Fast historical SaaS and shadow-AI discovery with employee-engagement (nudge) remediation and third-party risk.
Gaps: Discovery and governance focus; deep config-posture and ITDR depth are emphasized less.
Integrates with: 1Password ↗, Automox ↗, BeyondTrust ↗, Bitwarden ↗, Cisco ↗, Cloudflare ↗, Codacy ↗, CrowdStrike ↗
2 of 5 independent trust signals established
Nudge Security has 2 dimensions with established evidence. The rest have not been confirmed yet.
Not yet established: Independently verified · Behaviour under stress · Momentum
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
1 independent source(s) corroborate this vendor's claims.
Certifications & compliance claimsWhat the tiers meanVerified in a public registry — we confirmed this against an authoritative public registry (FedRAMP Marketplace, CSA STAR) and re-check it by the registry's own identifier. Stated by the vendor — the vendor says it on a page they control; a sourced claim about themselves, not an independent check. Detected on a page — found during automated enrichment, neither registry-confirmed nor stated on the vendor's own site.
Some certifications have no public registry at all — SOC 2 and HIPAA among them. For those, “not registry-verified” is not a shortfall and means nothing about the vendor.
Stated by the vendor
Some of these (SOC 2, HIPAA and similar) have no public registry, so no one can independently verify them — that is a fact about the framework, not about this vendor.
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Product information on this page is auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public sources and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst, unless an item is individually labelled otherwise. How trust works →
Is this a real, durable business?
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
What do they do when something goes wrong?
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?
How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.
Are they still shipping, or coasting?
Whether this vendor is visibly still building.
Security headers (3/5) — checked 10/18/2026
Infrastructure & transparency signals
“teams. No per-seat math. $750 /month billed annually · all” pricing page ↗
Nudge Security is the way to find out what applications your employees are actually using, and that's just not addressed completely by any other solution
It was a huge benefit to be able to plug in Nudge Security and see what was already in use
We’re a 100 percent fully remote company in a very heavily regulated industry. As a background check company, we deal with a lot of PII. So security is extremely important to us
Before it was just such a hassle to disconnect everything manually. With Nudge, it’s automatic