Endpoint protection platform using zero trust architecture and containment AI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
Tools & products
Read by an AI model from comodo.com’s own pages. What the vendor says it does, not independently verified.
Integrates with: CrowdStrike ↗, F-Secure ↗, Google ↗, Intrusion ↗, Microsoft ↗, SentinelOne ↗, Sophos ↗, Threat Intelligence ↗
2 of 5 independent trust signals established
Comodo has 2 dimensions with established evidence. The rest have not been confirmed yet.
Not yet established: Independently verified · Disclosure posture · Momentum
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.
Is this a real, durable business?
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
Security headers (0/5) — checked 10/18/2026
Infrastructure & transparency signals
2 CVEs have an estimated 10%-or-higher chance of having already been exploited despite not appearing on CISA's KEV catalog. KEV is a curated record of confirmed cases rather than a complete census, so this is where its coverage is likely thinnest — an estimate from EPSS history, not a finding. Based on a median of 2 EPSS observations per CVE.
Likely-exploited estimates here rest on a median of 2 EPSS observations per CVE — too little history to read as a trend yet. It deepens daily as scores are collected.
Comodo Dragon Browser versions up to 52.15.25.663 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in the DragonUpdater service due to an unquoted service path running with SYSTEM privileges. A local atta…
Comodo Chromodo Browser 52.15.25.664 contains an unquoted service path vulnerability in the ChromodoUpdater service that runs with SYSTEM privileges. A local attacker can insert a malicious executable…
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Datasheets, whitepapers, and case studies found on comodo.com by the enrichment loop. Links open the original documents on the vendor's own site.
Product information on this page is auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public sources and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst, unless an item is individually labelled otherwise. How trust works →
What do they do when something goes wrong?
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?
How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.
Are they still shipping, or coasting?
Whether this vendor is visibly still building.
Web Console in Comodo UTM Firewall before 2.7.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code without authentication via a crafted URL.
The ELF file parser in AhnLab V3 Internet Security 2011.01.18.00, Bitdefender 7.2, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, Command Antivirus 5.2.11.5, Comodo Anti…
The TAR file parser in AhnLab V3 Internet Security 2011.01.18.00, Avira AntiVir 7.11.1.163, Antiy Labs AVL SDK 2.0.3.7, avast! Antivirus 4.8.1351.0 and 5.0.677.…
The TAR file parser in AVG Anti-Virus 10.0.0.1190, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, Comodo Antivirus 7424, Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.1.0.1, eSafe 7.0.17.0, F…
The RAR file parser in ClamAV 0.96.4, Rising Antivirus 22.83.00.03, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, G Data AntiVirus 21, AVEngine 20101.3.0.103 in Symante…
Xcitium Client Security (XCS) before 13.8.2.10019 and Comodo Internet Security (CIS) through 12.3.4.8162 (fix expected by 2026 Q3) contain an integer underflow vulnerability in the firewall driver Ins…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the username paramet…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the openvpn_advanced endpoint. Attac…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains multiple reflected cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in the openvpn_users endpoint that allow attackers to inject malicious scripts through POST parameters. Atta…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the antispyware endpoint. Attackers …
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the dnsmasq endpoint. Attackers can …
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the VIRUS_ADMIN parameter. Attackers…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting unsanitized input to the EXCEPTIONSITELIST parameter.…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains multiple reflected cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in the /korugan/proxyconfig endpoint that allow attackers to inject malicious scripts through POST parameter…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains cross-site scripting vulnerabilities that allow attackers to inject malicious scripts through the vpnfw endpoint. Attackers can submit POST requests with script pay…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains multiple cross-site scripting vulnerabilities that allow attackers to inject malicious scripts through the policyfw endpoint. Attackers can submit POST requests wit…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the snat endpoint. Attackers can sen…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the schedule endpoint. Attackers can su…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the FWADDRESSES parameter. Attackers…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the protocol parameter. Attackers ca…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input through the device parameter. Attackers…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting unsanitized input to the hotspot_permanent_users endp…
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts by manipulating the ID parameter. Attackers can cra…