Autonomous XDR / all-in-one breach protection platform. AI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
Tools & products
We build profiles from public sources and haven't extracted a capability list for Cynet. Closest sources we do hold:
Drawn from this vendor's own public materials and authored to keep category questionnaires balanced. Gaps reflect capabilities not emphasized in public materials, not rankings.
Strengths: All-in-one platform (NGAV/EDR/XDR plus identity, network, SaaS, and 24x7 CyOps MDR) suited to lean security teams.
Gaps: Consolidation can trade depth for breadth; large-enterprise scale and tuning specifics are less emphasized publicly.
Integrates with: AI Score ↗, Journey ↗, Threat Intelligence ↗
Integrated by: D3 Security, OctoXLabs, Seceon Inc, ThreatAware, rebasoft
1 of 5 independent trust signals established
Cynet has one dimension with established evidence. The rest have not been confirmed yet.
Not yet established: Independently verified · Behaviour under stress · Disclosure posture · Momentum
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
1 independent source(s) corroborate this vendor's claims.
Is this a real, durable business?
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
Certifications & compliance claimsWhat the tiers meanVerified in a public registry — we confirmed this against an authoritative public registry (FedRAMP Marketplace, CSA STAR) and re-check it by the registry's own identifier. Stated by the vendor — the vendor says it on a page they control; a sourced claim about themselves, not an independent check. Detected on a page — found during automated enrichment, neither registry-confirmed nor stated on the vendor's own site.
Some certifications have no public registry at all — SOC 2 and HIPAA among them. For those, “not registry-verified” is not a shortfall and means nothing about the vendor.
Stated by the vendor
Some of these (SOC 2, HIPAA and similar) have no public registry, so no one can independently verify them — that is a fact about the framework, not about this vendor.
Security headers (4/5) — checked 10/18/2026
3 CVEs have an estimated 10%-or-higher chance of having already been exploited despite not appearing on CISA's KEV catalog. KEV is a curated record of confirmed cases rather than a complete census, so this is where its coverage is likely thinnest — an estimate from EPSS history, not a finding. Based on a median of 3 EPSS observations per CVE.
Cynet Client Agent v4.6.0.8010 allows attackers with Administrator rights to disable the EDR functions by disabling process privilege tokens.
Cynet 360 Web Portal before v4.5 was discovered to allow attackers to access a list of decoy users via a crafted GET request sent to /WebApp/DeceptionUser/GetAllDeceptionUsers.
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Product information on this page is auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public sources and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst, unless an item is individually labelled otherwise. How trust works →
What do they do when something goes wrong?
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?
How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.
Are they still shipping, or coasting?
Whether this vendor is visibly still building.
Infrastructure & transparency signals
Cynet 360 Web Portal before v4.5 was discovered to allow attackers to access a list of decoy users via a crafted GET request sent to /WebApp/DeceptionUser/GetAl…
Cynet 360 Web Portal before v4.5 was discovered to allow attackers to access a list of monitored files and profiles via a crafted GET request sent to /WebApp/Se…
Cynet 360 Web Portal before v4.5 was discovered to allow attackers to access a list of excluded files and profiles via a crafted GET request sent to /WebApp/Set…
Cynet Client Agent v4.6.0.8010 allows attackers with Administrator rights to disable the EDR functions by disabling process privilege tokens.
Cynet 360 Web Portal before v4.5 was discovered to allow attackers to access a list of monitored files and profiles via a crafted GET request sent to /WebApp/SettingsFileMonitor/GetFileMonitorProfiles…
Cynet 360 Web Portal before v4.5 was discovered to allow attackers to access a list of excluded files and profiles via a crafted GET request sent to /WebApp/SettingsExclusion/GetExclusionsProfiles.