Represented by AHEAD ↗, Carahsoft ↗, Converge Technology Solutions ↗, Exclusive Networks ↗, Mainline Information Systems ↗, Trace3 ↗, World Wide Technology ↗, ePlus ↗
Enterprise data storage platform with hybrid cloud mgmt & data services. AI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
Tools & products
We build profiles from public sources and haven't extracted a capability list for NetApp. Closest sources we do hold:
Showing the 12 closest of 36 — see all.
3 of 5 independent trust signals established
NetApp has 3 dimensions with established evidence. The rest have not been confirmed yet.
Not yet established: Independently verified · Disclosure posture
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
1 independent source(s) corroborate this vendor's claims.
Is this a real, durable business?
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
What do they do when something goes wrong?
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?
How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.
Are they still shipping, or coasting?
Whether this vendor is visibly still building.
Certifications & compliance claimsWhat the tiers meanVerified in a public registry — we confirmed this against an authoritative public registry (FedRAMP Marketplace, CSA STAR) and re-check it by the registry's own identifier. Stated by the vendor — the vendor says it on a page they control; a sourced claim about themselves, not an independent check. Detected on a page — found during automated enrichment, neither registry-confirmed nor stated on the vendor's own site.
Some certifications have no public registry at all — SOC 2 and HIPAA among them. For those, “not registry-verified” is not a shortfall and means nothing about the vendor.
Stated by the vendor
Some of these (SOC 2, HIPAA and similar) have no public registry, so no one can independently verify them — that is a fact about the framework, not about this vendor.
Infrastructure & transparency signals
45 CVEs have an estimated 10%-or-higher chance of having already been exploited despite not appearing on CISA's KEV catalog. KEV is a curated record of confirmed cases rather than a complete census, so this is where its coverage is likely thinnest — an estimate from EPSS history, not a finding. Based on a median of 5 EPSS observations per CVE.
SNMPv3 HMAC verification in (1) Net-SNMP 5.2.x before 5.2.4.1, 5.3.x before 5.3.2.1, and 5.4.x before 5.4.1.1; (2) UCD-SNMP; (3) eCos; (4) Juniper Session and R…
The installer in NetApp OnCommand Workflow Automation before 2.2.1P1 and 3.x before 3.0P1 sets up the Java Debugging Wire Protocol (JDWP) service, which allows …
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in NetApp Data ONTAP, as used on NetApp and IBM eServer platforms, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands, ca…
NetApp OnCommand Balance before 4.2P2 contains a "default privileged account," which allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.
NetApp SANtricity Web Services Proxy versions 1.10.x000.0002 through 2.12.X000.0002 and SANtricity Storage Manager 11.30.0X00.0004 through 11.42.0X00.0001 ship …
NetApp Blue XP Connector versions prior to 3.9.25 expose information via a directory listing. A new Connector architecture resolves this issue - obtaining the fix requires redeploying a fresh Connecto…
NetApp Virtual Desktop Service (VDS) when used with an HTML5 gateway is susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could allow an unauthenticated attacker to takeover a Remote De…
NetApp Cloud Manager versions prior to 3.9.10 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to retrieve sensitive data via the web proxy.
NetApp Cloud Manager versions prior to 3.9.9 log sensitive information when an Active Directory connection fails. The logged information is available only to authenticated users. Customers with auto-u…
NetApp Cloud Manager versions prior to 3.9.9 log sensitive information that is available only to authenticated users. Customers with auto-upgrade enabled should already be on a fixed version while cus…
An issue was discovered in Veritas Enterprise Vault through 14.0. On start-up, it loads the OpenSSL library. The OpenSSL library then attempts to load the openssl.cnf configuration file (which does no…
The NetApp HCI H610C, H615C and H610S Baseboard Management Controllers (BMC) are shipped with a documented default account and password that should be changed during the initial node setup. During upg…
Certain versions of the NetApp Service Processor and Baseboard Management Controller firmware allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).
NetApp FAS 8300/8700 and AFF A400 Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) firmware versions 13.x prior to 13.1P1 were shipped with a default account enabled that could allow unauthorized arbitrary comma…
NetApp Snap Creator Framework before 4.3P1 allows remote authenticated users to conduct clickjacking attacks via unspecified vectors.
NetApp OnCommand System Manager 2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary commands in the Halt/Reboot interface.
NetApp OnCommand System Manager 2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to include arbitrary files through specially crafted requests to the "diagnostic" page using the SnapMirror log path parameter.
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in NetApp OnCommand System Manager before 2.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the 'full-name' and 'comment' fields.
NetApp AFF A700s Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) firmware versions 1.22 and higher were shipped with a default account enabled that could allow unauthorized arbitrary command execution.
Element Plug-in for vCenter Server versions prior to 4.2.3 may disclose sensitive account information to an unauthenticated attacker. NetApp HCI Compute Node versions prior to 1.4P2 bundle affected ve…
Certain versions between 2.x to 5.x (refer to advisory) of the NetApp Service Processor firmware were shipped with a default account enabled that could allow unauthorized arbitrary command execution. …
NetApp SnapCenter Server prior to 4.1 does not set the secure flag for a sensitive cookie in an HTTPS session which can allow the transmission of the cookie in plain text over an unencrypted channel.
NetApp SnapCenter Server prior to 4.0 is susceptible to cross site scripting vulnerability that could allow a privileged user to inject arbitrary scripts into the custom secondary policy label field.
NetApp E-Series SANtricity OS Controller Software 11.30 and later version 11.30.5 is susceptible to unauthenticated remote code execution.
Read-Only export policy rules are not correctly enforced in Clustered Data ONTAP 8.3 Release Candidate versions and therefore may allow more than "read-only" access from authenticated SMBv2 and SMBv3 …
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Product information on this page is auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public sources and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst, unless an item is individually labelled otherwise. How trust works →