Domain security checker for email authentication protocol verification AI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
Tools & products
We build profiles from public sources and haven't extracted a capability list for Valimail. Closest sources we do hold:
Showing the 12 closest of 101 — see all.
Integrates with: Autonomous Security ↗, Cloudflare ↗, DigiCert ↗, EasyDMARC ↗, Google ↗, Journey ↗, Microsoft ↗, Proofpoint ↗
1 of 5 independent trust signals established
Valimail has one dimension with established evidence. The rest have not been confirmed yet.
Not yet established: Independently verified · Operating durability · Behaviour under stress · Disclosure posture
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
1 independent source(s) corroborate this vendor's claims.
Is this a real, durable business?
Certifications & compliance claimsWhat the tiers meanVerified in a public registry — we confirmed this against an authoritative public registry (FedRAMP Marketplace, CSA STAR) and re-check it by the registry's own identifier. Stated by the vendor — the vendor says it on a page they control; a sourced claim about themselves, not an independent check. Detected on a page — found during automated enrichment, neither registry-confirmed nor stated on the vendor's own site.
Some certifications have no public registry at all — SOC 2 and HIPAA among them. For those, “not registry-verified” is not a shortfall and means nothing about the vendor.
Stated by the vendor
Some of these (SOC 2, HIPAA and similar) have no public registry, so no one can independently verify them — that is a fact about the framework, not about this vendor.
Security headers (5/5) — checked 10/18/2026
No outages recorded since we started watching (first checked Aug 14, 2026, 11:19 AM).
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Product information on this page is auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public sources and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst, unless an item is individually labelled otherwise. How trust works →
Integrated by: Obsidian Security, Red Sift
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
What do they do when something goes wrong?
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?
How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.
Are they still shipping, or coasting?
Whether this vendor is visibly still building.
Infrastructure & transparency signals
We had a handful of incidents where employees received an email that appeared to be an urgent wire transfer request from an executive. To the untrained eye, they looked like legitimate emails coming from an Agilent email address. We knew we needed a way to stop people from sending email attacks to our employees and to our customers that appeared to come from Agilent