OAuth 2.0 authorization for browserless and input-constrained devices AI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
Tools & products
We build profiles from public sources and haven't extracted a capability list for Auth0. Closest sources we do hold:
Integrates with: DataGuard ↗, Datadog ↗, Multifactor ↗, OneTrust ↗, Token ↗
Integrated by: 1Kosmos, AccuKnox, Akeyless Security, Axoflow, Beyond Identity, Bitwarden
4 of 5 independent trust signals established
Auth0 has 4 dimensions with established evidence. The rest have not been confirmed yet.
Not yet established: Independently verified
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
1 independent source(s) corroborate this vendor's claims.
Certifications & compliance claimsWhat the tiers meanVerified in a public registry — we confirmed this against an authoritative public registry (FedRAMP Marketplace, CSA STAR) and re-check it by the registry's own identifier. Stated by the vendor — the vendor says it on a page they control; a sourced claim about themselves, not an independent check. Detected on a page — found during automated enrichment, neither registry-confirmed nor stated on the vendor's own site.
Some certifications have no public registry at all — SOC 2 and HIPAA among them. For those, “not registry-verified” is not a shortfall and means nothing about the vendor.
Stated by the vendor
7 CVEs have an estimated 10%-or-higher chance of having already been exploited despite not appearing on CISA's KEV catalog. KEV is a curated record of confirmed cases rather than a complete census, so this is where its coverage is likely thinnest — an estimate from EPSS history, not a finding. Based on a median of 2 EPSS observations per CVE.
Likely-exploited estimates here rest on a median of 2 EPSS observations per CVE — too little history to read as a trend yet. It deepens daily as scores are collected.
The auth0/java-jwt library may terminate a thread if it receives a JWT with a timestamp claim (exp, nbf, iat) containing an out-of-range value. The condition occurs during token parsing, prior to sign…
When the authorize() method is called with a maxAge parameter, the auth0.js library does not validate the auth_time claim in the resulting ID token against the requested maxAge value. As a result, an …
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Product information on this page is auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public sources and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst, unless an item is individually labelled otherwise. How trust works →
Is this a real, durable business?
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
What do they do when something goes wrong?
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?
How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.
Are they still shipping, or coasting?
Whether this vendor is visibly still building.
Some of these (SOC 2, HIPAA and similar) have no public registry, so no one can independently verify them — that is a fact about the framework, not about this vendor.
Security headers (5/5) — checked 10/18/2026
Infrastructure & transparency signals
The Auth0 authentication service before 2017-10-15 allows privilege escalation because the JWT audience is not validated.
An issue was discovered in the Login by Auth0 plugin before 4.0.0 for WordPress. It has numerous fields that can contain data that is pulled from different sour…
The Auth0 wp-auth0 plugin 3.11.x before 3.11.3 for WordPress allows XSS via a wle parameter associated with wp-login.php.
An issue was discovered in the Login by Auth0 plugin before 4.0.0 for WordPress. A user can perform an insecure direct object reference.
Auth0 Auth0-WCF-Service-JWT before 1.0.4 leaks the expected JWT signature in an error message when it cannot successfully validate the JWT signature. If this er…
When a username for an Active Directory connection is a domain without a local part, the auth0-lock library initiates the authentication transaction with a GET request instead of a POST request. As a …
The auth0/nextjs-auth0 SDK validates that the returnTo parameter is a same-origin URL. The SDK then stores this value and, in a later step, reconstructs it for the post-authentication redirect. The re…
Auth0 Symfony is a Symfony SDK for Auth0 Authentication and Management APIs. From 5.0.0-BETA0 until 5.9.0, the Authorizer::authenticate() and Authorizer::supports() paths in the Authorizer security au…
The Auth0 AD/LDAP Connector improperly processes a configuration value during service startup. This allows a low-privileged user on the host system to modify the connector's configuration. When the se…
The Auth0 AD/LDAP Connector is vulnerable to stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) issues due to improper HTML encoding of data in search results and updater log content displayed in the admin panel. An a…
The administrative panel of the Auth0 AD/LDAP Connector (versions 6.5.0 and earlier) listens on the local loopback interface without requiring authentication. This allows a local, low-privileged user …
Flowise before 3.1.0 (versions 3.0.13 and earlier) contains a missing authentication vulnerability in the /api/v1/loginmethod endpoint that allows unauthenticated users to retrieve an organization's c…
Auth0.js is a client-side JavaScript library for Auth0. From 8.11.0 to 9.32.0, under specific preconditions, the Auth0.js SDK may improperly return user profile information using a valid access token …
The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. In versions 4.12.0 through 4.17.1, simultaneous requests that trigger a nonce retry may cause the proxy…
OAuthenticator is software that allows OAuth2 identity providers to be plugged in and used with JupyterHub. Prior to version 17.4.0, an authentication bypass vulnerability in oauthenticator allows an …
Auth0-PHP is a PHP SDK for Auth0 Authentication and Management APIs. From version 8.0.0 to before version 8.19.0, in applications built with the Auth0 PHP SDK, cookies are encrypted with insufficient …
Auth0-PHP is a PHP SDK for Auth0 Authentication and Management APIs. In applications built with the Auth0-PHP SDK, the audience validation in access tokens is performed improperly. Without proper vali…
The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. Versions 4.9.0 through 4.12.1 contain an input-validation flaw in the returnTo parameter, which could a…
The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may resu…
auth0/node-jws is a JSON Web Signature implementation for Node.js. In versions 3.2.2 and earlier and version 4.0.0, auth0/node-jws has an improper signature verification vulnerability when using the H…
The Flock Safety Pisco com.flocksafety.android.pisco application 6.21.11 for Android (installed on Falcon and Sparrow License Plate Readers and Bravo Edge AI Compute Devices) has a cleartext Auth0 cli…
auth0-PHP is an SDK for Auth0 Authentication and Management APIs. In versions 3.3.0 through 8.16.0, the Bulk User Import endpoint in applications built with the SDK does not validate the file-path wra…
The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. In Auth0 Next.js SDK versions 4.0.1 through 4.6.0, `__session` cookies set by auth0.middleware may be c…
Auth0 has high security standards, like brute force detection and Okta Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). And we can make use of them in one centralized place as well, which we couldn’t before
There was a gap in user experience with how easy it was for customers to access each of our applications
What we needed was industry-leading security features, progressive profiling, and the ability to cater to the surge of fans over a race weekend
Okta was an enterprise-ready solution for us, fulfilling all our main criteria: flexibility, customization, security, and centralized management of the whole system. It was a perfect fit
We were dealing with fractured and dispersed infrastructures