Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksNothing here is ranked by paymentHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Fortra

Fortra

enriched
Application Security (ASPM)Breach & Attack Simulation / Pen TestingCloud Access Security BrokerContinuous Controls MonitoringData Loss PreventionData Security Posture Management (DSPM)Digital Risk Protection (DRP)Email SecuritySecure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)Security Awareness TrainingVulnerability Management

Represented by Carahsoft ↗

fortra.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Headquartered in United StatesHeadquarters countrySourced only from this vendor's own published headquarters address (schema.org structured data on their site) — never guessed from domain TLD. Source ↗

Do you work at Fortra?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Fortra's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

2 of 5 independent trust signals established

Fortra has 2 dimensions with established evidence. The rest have not been confirmed yet.

Not yet established: Independently verified · Disclosure posture · Momentum

Do you work at Fortra? Claim this profile →

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Fortra we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 11 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Strong

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 3 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Domain registered 1998 — 27 years ago
    • Headquarters: United States
Data coverage: 18/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness38/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 38

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

4 detected

Integrated by: CMD+CTRL Security, OctoXLabs, Seemplicity, UncommonX

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Black box fuzzer and DAST tool for testing application security AI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are labeled by how well evidenced each one is — confirmed in a public registry, stated by the vendor, or merely detected on a page — and every claim links to its source. Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. These are independent signals and are not blended into a single score.

8 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Infrastructure & transparency signals

Vuln disclosure policy ↗GitHub (19 repos) ↗Domain since 1998

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL202420252026CVE-2026-12164 · MEDIUM 4.4 · 2026-06-23CVE-2026-12163 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2026-06-23CVE-2026-9863 · HIGH 7.5 · 2026-06-15CVE-2026-9862 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2026-06-15CVE-2026-1089 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2026-04-21CVE-2026-0972 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2026-04-21

Known CVEs (26)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2026-12164 ↗MEDIUM 4.42026

    Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while…

  • CVE-2026-12163 ↗MEDIUM 5.52026

    Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0.1 contain a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Asset View UI component. An authenticat…

  • CVE-2026-9863 ↗HIGH 7.52026

    Fortra BoKS Manager contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the client upgrade and patch tooling for legacy tar-based client installations. A malicious or compromised legacy tar-installed cl…

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
CovertSwarmdope.securityESETForcepointFortinetFYEOGoSecureKaseyaKeepnet LabsNetskopeRapid7Tanium

Products (13)

Product information on this page is auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public sources and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst, unless an item is individually labelled otherwise. How trust works →

Breach & Attack Simulation / Pen Testing

1
  • Fortra Cobalt Strikesource ↗
    Threat emulation tool for adversary simulations and red team operations

Security Awareness Training

1
  • Fortra Terranova Securitysource ↗
    Security awareness training platform with phishing simulations and content

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)

2
  • Fortra SWGsource ↗
    Cloud-native secure web gateway for web traffic inspection and threat protection
  • Fortra ZTNAsource ↗
    Zero trust network access solution for secure remote access to private apps

Email Security

1
  • Fortra Email Security & Anti-Phishingsource ↗
    Email security platform protecting against phishing, BEC, and data loss

Vulnerability Management

1
  • Fortra VMsource ↗
    Risk-based vulnerability management platform for scanning and prioritization

Application Security (ASPM)

1
  • Fortra BeSTORMsource ↗
    Black box fuzzer and DAST tool for testing application security

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

1
  • Fortra DSPMsource ↗
    DSPM solution for discovering, classifying, and protecting sensitive data

Digital Risk Protection (DRP)

1
  • Fortra Brand Protectionsource ↗
    Digital risk protection platform for brand abuse and online threats

Data Loss Prevention

2
  • Fortra DLPsource ↗
    DLP platform protecting sensitive data across endpoints, networks, and cloud
  • Fortra Digital Guardiansource ↗
    Enterprise DLP platform protecting sensitive data across endpoints and cloud

Continuous Controls Monitoring

1
  • Fortra Tripwire Enterprisesource ↗
    File integrity monitoring and security configuration management platform

Cloud Access Security Broker

1
  • Fortra CASBsource ↗
    Cloud Access Security Broker for monitoring and securing cloud application usage
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 26 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 6 rated critical
    • No public status page found
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 2 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No trust center found
    • Publishes a vulnerability disclosure policy
  • Limited

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 1 of 2

    Whether this vendor is visibly still building.

    • Public GitHub org with 19 repositories
  • CVE-2026-0971 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2026-04-21CVE-2025-1241 · MEDIUM 5.8 · 2026-04-21CVE-2025-14362 · HIGH 7.3 · 2026-04-21CVE-2025-13532 · MEDIUM 6.2 · 2025-12-16CVE-2025-8148 · MEDIUM 4.2 · 2025-12-06CVE-2025-10035 · CRITICAL 10.0 · 2025-09-19CVE-2025-8450 · HIGH 8.2 · 2025-08-19CVE-2025-3871 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2025-07-16CVE-2025-5141 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2025-06-18CVE-2024-11922 · MEDIUM 6.3 · 2025-04-29CVE-2024-9945 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2024-12-13CVE-2024-8264 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2024-10-10CVE-2024-5276 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2024-06-26CVE-2024-0259 · HIGH 7.3 · 2024-03-28CVE-2024-0204 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2024-01-22CVE-2021-26837 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2023-09-19CVE-2023-2991 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2023-06-23CVE-2023-2990 · HIGH 7.5 · 2023-06-23CVE-2023-2989 · CRITICAL 9.1 · 2023-06-23CVE-2023-0669 · HIGH 7.2 · 2023-02-07
  • CVE-2026-9862 ↗CRITICAL 9.82026

    Fortra's  Core Privileged Access Manager (BoKS) contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the boks_autoregisterd service. A remote attacker with network access to the service may be able to ca…

  • CVE-2026-1089 ↗MEDIUM 6.52026

    User‑Controlled HTTP Header in Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT prior to version 7.10.0 allows attackers to trigger a DNS lookup, as well as DNS Rebinding and Information Disclosure.

  • CVE-2026-0972 ↗MEDIUM 5.42026

    HTML injection is possible in system generated emails in Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT prior to 7.10.0. Note: The title, details, and description of this CVE were corrected post-publishing.

  • CVE-2026-0971 ↗MEDIUM 4.32026

    An improper session timeout issue in Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT prior to version 7.10.0 results in SAML configured Web Users being redirected to the regular login page instead of the SAML login page.

  • CVE-2025-1241 ↗MEDIUM 5.82026

    Encrypted values in Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT prior to version 7.10.0 and GoAnywhere Agents prior to version 2.2.0 utilize a static IV which allows admin users to brute-force decryption of data.

  • CVE-2025-14362 ↗HIGH 7.32026

    The login limit is not enforced on the SFTP service of Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT prior to 7.10.0 if the Web User attempting to be logged in to is configured to log in with an SSH Key, making the SSH key…

  • CVE-2025-13532 ↗MEDIUM 6.22025

    Insecure defaults in the Server Agent component of Fortra's Core Privileged Access Manager (BoKS) can result in the selection of weak password hash algorithms.  This issue affects BoKS Server Agent 9.…

  • CVE-2025-8148 ↗MEDIUM 4.22025

    An Improper Access Control in the SFTP service in Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT prior to version 7.9.0 allows Web Users with an Authentication Alias and a valid SSH key but limited to Password authenticatio…

  • CVE-2025-10035 ↗⚠ actively exploitedCRITICAL 10.02025

    A deserialization vulnerability in the License Servlet of Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT allows an actor with a validly forged license response signature to deserialize an arbitrary actor-controlled object, …

  • CVE-2025-8450 ↗HIGH 8.22025

    Improper Access Control issue in the Workflow component of Fortra's FileCatalyst allows unauthenticated users to upload arbitrary files via the order forms page.

  • CVE-2025-3871 ↗MEDIUM 5.32025

    Broken access control in Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT prior to 7.8.1 allows an attacker to create a denial of service situation when configured to use GoAnywhere One-Time Password (GOTP) email two-factor a…

  • CVE-2025-5141 ↗MEDIUM 5.52025

    A binary in the BoKS Server Agent component of Fortra's Core Privileged Access Manager (BoKS) on versions 7.2.0 (up to 7.2.0.17), 8.1.0 (up to 8.1.0.22), 8.1.1 (up to 8.1.1.7), 9.0.0 (up to 9.0.0.1) a…

  • CVE-2024-11922 ↗MEDIUM 6.32025

    Missing input validation in certain features of the Web Client of Fortra's GoAnywhere prior to version 7.8.0 allows an attacker with permission to trigger emails to insert arbitrary HTML or JavaScript…

  • CVE-2024-9945 ↗MEDIUM 5.32024

    An information-disclosure vulnerability exists in Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT application prior to version 7.7.0 that allows external access to the resources in certain admin root folders.

  • CVE-2024-8264 ↗MEDIUM 5.52024

    Fortra's Robot Schedule Enterprise Agent prior to version 3.05 writes FTP username and password information to the agent log file when detailed logging is enabled.

  • CVE-2024-5276 ↗CRITICAL 9.82024

    A SQL Injection vulnerability in Fortra FileCatalyst Workflow allows an attacker to modify application data.  Likely impacts include creation of administrative users and deletion or modification of da…

  • CVE-2024-0259 ↗HIGH 7.32024

    Fortra's Robot Schedule Enterprise Agent for Windows prior to version 3.04 is susceptible to privilege escalation. A low-privileged user can overwrite the service executable. When the service is resta…

  • …and 6 more