Represented by Carahsoft ↗, Trace3 ↗
High-performance IPsec encryption for multicloud & hybrid environments AI-generated from public sourcesThe starting point for every profile: auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials, and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst. Nothing here is hidden or overstated — it simply has not been reviewed yet.Where every profile starts, before the vendor or an analyst has reviewed it. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
Tools & products
Read by an AI model from aviatrix.ai’s own pages. What the vendor says it does, not independently verified.
Integrates with: Datadog ↗, GitHub ↗, Google ↗, Megaport ↗, Microsoft ↗, Native Security ↗, Oracle ↗, ServiceNow ↗
1 of 5 independent trust signals established
Aviatrix has one dimension with established evidence. The rest have not been confirmed yet.
Not yet established: Independently verified · Operating durability · Disclosure posture · Momentum
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
1 independent source(s) corroborate this vendor's claims.
Certifications & compliance claimsWhat the tiers meanVerified in a public registry — we confirmed this against an authoritative public registry (FedRAMP Marketplace, CSA STAR) and re-check it by the registry's own identifier. Stated by the vendor — the vendor says it on a page they control; a sourced claim about themselves, not an independent check. Detected on a page — found during automated enrichment, neither registry-confirmed nor stated on the vendor's own site.
Some certifications have no public registry at all — SOC 2 and HIPAA among them. For those, “not registry-verified” is not a shortfall and means nothing about the vendor.
Detected on a page
Some of these (SOC 2, HIPAA and similar) have no public registry, so no one can independently verify them — that is a fact about the framework, not about this vendor.
2 CVEs have an estimated 10%-or-higher chance of having already been exploited despite not appearing on CISA's KEV catalog. KEV is a curated record of confirmed cases rather than a complete census, so this is where its coverage is likely thinnest — an estimate from EPSS history, not a finding. Based on a median of 2 EPSS observations per CVE.
Likely-exploited estimates here rest on a median of 2 EPSS observations per CVE — too little history to read as a trend yet. It deepens daily as scores are collected.
Aviatrix Controller versions prior to 7.1.4208, 7.2.5090, and 8.0.0 fail to sanitize user input prior to passing the input to command line utilities, allowing command injection via special characters …
Aviatrix Controller versions prior to 7.1.4208, 7.2.5090, and 8.0.0 do not enforce rate limiting on password reset attempts, allowing adversaries to brute force guess the 6-digit password reset PIN
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Product information on this page is auto-generated by 0-Doubt from public sources and not yet confirmed by the vendor or an independent analyst, unless an item is individually labelled otherwise. How trust works →
Integrated by: HiddenLayer, Wiz
Is this a real, durable business?
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
What do they do when something goes wrong?
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?
How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.
Are they still shipping, or coasting?
Whether this vendor is visibly still building.
Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Aviatrix.
Security headers (5/5) — checked 10/18/2026
Infrastructure & transparency signals
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before 7.1.4191 and 7.2.x before 7.2.4996. Due to the improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS c…
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller 6.x before 6.5-1804.1922. Unrestricted upload of a file with a dangerous type is possible, which allows an unauth…
The Aviatrix OpenVPN client through 2.5.7 on Linux, macOS, and Windows is vulnerable when OpenSSL parameters are altered from the issued value set; the paramete…
Aviatrix Controller versions prior to 7.1.4208, 7.2.5090, and 8.0.0 fail to sanitize user input prior to passing the input to command line utilities, allowing c…
An Elevation of Privilege issue was discovered in Aviatrix VPN Client before 2.10.7, because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-7224. This affects Linux, macOS, …
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before 7.1.4191 and 7.2.x before 7.2.4996. Due to the improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command, an unauthenticated attacker is a…
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Gateway before 6.6.5712 and 6.7.x before 6.7.1376. Because Gateway API functions mishandle authentication, an authenticated VPN user can inject arbitrary commands.
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller 6.x before 6.5-1804.1922. Unrestricted upload of a file with a dangerous type is possible, which allows an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code…
Aviatrix VPN Client before 2.14.14 on Windows has an unquoted search path that enables local privilege escalation to the SYSTEM user, if the machine is misconfigured to allow unprivileged users to wri…
Arbitrary File Write exists in Aviatrix VPN Client 2.8.2 and earlier. The VPN service writes logs to a location that is world writable and can be leveraged to gain write access to any file on the syst…
Insecure File Permissions exist in Aviatrix Controller 5.3.1516. Several world writable files and directories were found in the controller resource. Note: All Aviatrix appliances are fully encrypted. …
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before R6.0.2483. Several APIs contain functions that allow arbitrary files to be uploaded to the web tree.
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before R6.0.2483. Multiple executable files, that implement API endpoints, do not require a valid session ID for access.
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before R5.3.1151. Encrypted key values are stored in a readable file.
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before R5.3.1151. An encrypted file containing credentials to unrelated systems is protected by a three-character key.
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before R5.4.1290. The htaccess protection mechanism to prevent requests to directories can be bypassed for file downloading.
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before R5.4.1290. There is an insecure sudo rule: a user exists that can execute all commands as any user on the system.
An Elevation of Privilege issue was discovered in Aviatrix VPN Client before 2.10.7, because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-7224. This affects Linux, macOS, and Windows installations for certain Op…
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before 5.4.1066. A Controller Web Interface session token parameter is not required on an API call, which opens the application up to a Cross Site Reques…
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller through 5.1. An attacker with any signed SAML assertion from the Identity Provider can establish a connection (even if that SAML assertion has expired or…
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before 5.4.1204. It contains credentials unused by the software.
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before 5.4.1204. There is a Observable Response Discrepancy from the API, which makes it easier to perform user enumeration via brute force.
An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before 5.4.1204. An API call on the web interface lacked a session token check to control access, leading to CSRF.