Start from a neutral baseline and add what matters to you. Criteria are labeled by source — the platform baseline is architecture-neutral; buyer-contributed criteria are shown separately.
Build your evaluation
no account needed
Match on your requirements
no account needed
This evaluation is stored in your browser only. We cannot see it, and it is not tied to any account. Save it to a link or create an account to keep it across devices — you can export it at any time either way.
1. Weight what matters
20 criteria
baselineWhat database types and deployment models does the platform support — on-prem relational, cloud-managed (RDS, Cloud SQL, Azure SQL), and NoSQL — and is monitoring/protection depth consistent across all of them or deepest on one category?
baselineDescribe real-time database activity monitoring (DAM) capability — can it detect and alert on anomalous query patterns, privileged-user misuse, or data exfiltration via bulk export in real time, and what is the measured detection latency with a customer reference?
baselineHow does the platform monitor and control privileged/DBA access specifically — session recording, just-in-time elevated access, or query-level approval workflows for sensitive tables — versus only monitoring after the fact?
baselineWhat is the performance overhead of the monitoring mechanism on production database throughput — network-based/agentless monitoring versus in-database agent — and what is the measured impact under realistic production query load?
baselineDetail sensitive-data discovery integration — does the platform automatically discover and classify sensitive data within monitored databases to prioritize protection and alerting on the tables that matter most, or does it require the customer to manually specify sensitive tables?
baselineHow does the platform handle encrypted database connections and encrypted-at-rest data — can it still inspect query content for threat detection, or does encryption create a blind spot the platform is candid about?
baselineExplain compliance reporting for database-specific regulatory requirements (PCI DSS database logging requirements, GDPR data access auditing) — are compliance reports pre-built and automatically generated, or does the customer need to build custom reports from raw activity logs?
baselineWhat automated response actions are available for detected threats (e.g., blocking a malicious query, terminating a session, quarantining a compromised credential) versus detection/alerting only requiring manual DBA intervention?
baselineWhat is the pricing model — per database instance, per data volume, or a flat enterprise tier — and how does cost scale as the organization's database estate grows across more instances and cloud accounts?
baselineDescribe incident-forensics capability for a confirmed data-exfiltration event via database access — can the platform quickly reconstruct exactly what data was queried/exported, by whom, and when, with a concrete turnaround-time example from a customer reference?
baselineDetail historical trend reporting on database security posture (anomalous-query-event trend, privileged-access-usage trend) over time, suitable for demonstrating program maturity to leadership.
baselineHow does the platform integrate with (versus duplicate) the customer's existing DSPM/data-classification tooling so database-security findings feed into the same unified data-risk view rather than a disconnected, database-specific dashboard?
baselineWho within the organization gets access to database activity monitoring findings and query logs, and is there role-based access control given that this data can reveal sensitive query patterns and the exact content of sensitive-data access?
baselineWhat is the measured false-positive rate specifically on anomalous-query detection (flagging a legitimate query pattern as suspicious), and what tuning process minimizes disruption for legitimate DBA and application activity during initial rollout?
baselineHow consistent is monitoring depth across a multi-cloud/hybrid database environment — is coverage equally deep across on-prem, AWS RDS, Azure SQL, and GCP Cloud SQL, or meaningfully shallower for one environment?
baselineWhat is a customer-referenced onboarding timeline from contract signature to the platform providing genuinely useful, tuned monitoring across an existing, large database estate with no prior DAM coverage, and what customer-side effort does that require?
baselineVendor should have a tool capable of monitoring, detecting and managing incidents for database security events (access to sensitive/PII data, database logins with client IP/server IP/source program info, admin command auditing) and IT infrastructure security events (buffer overflow, port/vulnerability scans, password cracking, worm/virus outbreak, unauthorized firewall rule changes, SQL injection, XSS, layer 7 web attacks) via integration with the WAF/Firewall solution deployed at the financial institution.
baselineDevelop an Application Security Policy; develop source control policy and procedures; develop database access security and procedures; review current application implementation (release management) procedures and provide recommendations.
baselineAnalyze the organization's databases to check for updated patches and versions, weak passwords, configuration errors, access control list (ACL) issues, etc.
baselineDemonstrate configuration, support, and architectural design experience with AppDynamics, Azure Application Insight, HP Fortify, F5 Web Application Firewall, Checkpoint Next-Generation Firewalls, Microsoft SQL databases, and cloud/hybrid/on-premise application platforms in an enterprise environment.
Signing up adds sharing with your team, sending this as an RFP to vendors, and private document sharing. Nothing above is taken away, and nothing here is sent anywhere until you choose to.
Platform baseline
neutral · staff-reviewed
RFIWhat database types and deployment models does the platform support — on-prem relational, cloud-managed (RDS, Cloud SQL, Azure SQL), and NoSQL — and is monitoring/protection depth consistent across all of them or deepest on one category?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Strong answers give a per-type coverage breakdown; a platform historically strong on on-prem Oracle/SQL Server monitoring may have materially shallower support for newer cloud-managed or NoSQL platforms.
RFPDescribe real-time database activity monitoring (DAM) capability — can it detect and alert on anomalous query patterns, privileged-user misuse, or data exfiltration via bulk export in real time, and what is the measured detection latency with a customer reference?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Look for a genuine real-time (not batch/log-review) detection capability and a concrete measured latency figure from production use, not a lab benchmark.
RFIHow does the platform monitor and control privileged/DBA access specifically — session recording, just-in-time elevated access, or query-level approval workflows for sensitive tables — versus only monitoring after the fact?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Proactive controls (JIT access, query approval) prevent misuse; after-the-fact monitoring only enables detection and response once data may already be exposed — ask which model the vendor actually implements.
RFIWhat is the performance overhead of the monitoring mechanism on production database throughput — network-based/agentless monitoring versus in-database agent — and what is the measured impact under realistic production query load?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
In-database agents typically see more (privileged access, encrypted queries) but add real performance overhead; network-based monitoring has less overhead but can miss encrypted or local traffic. Ask for a measured, not theoretical, overhead figure.
RFPDetail sensitive-data discovery integration — does the platform automatically discover and classify sensitive data within monitored databases to prioritize protection and alerting on the tables that matter most, or does it require the customer to manually specify sensitive tables?
From other buyers
crowdsourced · anonymized
💬
No buyer-contributed criteria yet
Verified buyers can suggest criteria (anonymized before pooling).
Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Automated discovery feeding prioritized monitoring is stronger than requiring the customer to already know and manually configure every sensitive table — misses unknown sensitive data by default.
RFIHow does the platform handle encrypted database connections and encrypted-at-rest data — can it still inspect query content for threat detection, or does encryption create a blind spot the platform is candid about?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Encryption can genuinely blind network-based monitoring; a credible vendor is explicit about this limitation and how their architecture (e.g., in-database agent) addresses or doesn't address it.
RFPExplain compliance reporting for database-specific regulatory requirements (PCI DSS database logging requirements, GDPR data access auditing) — are compliance reports pre-built and automatically generated, or does the customer need to build custom reports from raw activity logs?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Pre-built, regulation-specific reports save significant compliance effort; ask for a specific example report rather than accepting a general 'compliance-ready' claim.
RFIWhat automated response actions are available for detected threats (e.g., blocking a malicious query, terminating a session, quarantining a compromised credential) versus detection/alerting only requiring manual DBA intervention?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Automated blocking response reduces the window of exposure for active threats like SQL injection or data exfiltration; ask which specific threat types trigger automatic versus manual-only response.
RFIWhat is the pricing model — per database instance, per data volume, or a flat enterprise tier — and how does cost scale as the organization's database estate grows across more instances and cloud accounts?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Look for transparent, predictable scaling economics; a vendor unable to project cost at meaningfully more database instances creates real budget risk for a growing data estate.
RFPDescribe incident-forensics capability for a confirmed data-exfiltration event via database access — can the platform quickly reconstruct exactly what data was queried/exported, by whom, and when, with a concrete turnaround-time example from a customer reference?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Strong answers describe a fast, specific forensic reconstruction capability with a real turnaround-time figure — this is the highest-stakes use case (a confirmed exfiltration), not just preventive monitoring.
RFIDetail historical trend reporting on database security posture (anomalous-query-event trend, privileged-access-usage trend) over time, suitable for demonstrating program maturity to leadership.Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Trend-over-time reporting is a distinct capability from a real-time activity dashboard — confirm this exists as a maintained, exportable report.
RFPHow does the platform integrate with (versus duplicate) the customer's existing DSPM/data-classification tooling so database-security findings feed into the same unified data-risk view rather than a disconnected, database-specific dashboard?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Look for genuine integration into a unified data-risk view; a standalone database dashboard disconnected from the broader DSPM picture creates real reconciliation burden.
RFIWho within the organization gets access to database activity monitoring findings and query logs, and is there role-based access control given that this data can reveal sensitive query patterns and the exact content of sensitive-data access?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Database activity logs can themselves contain or reveal sensitive data-access patterns — role-based access control over this specific asset is an often-overlooked consideration.
RFIWhat is the measured false-positive rate specifically on anomalous-query detection (flagging a legitimate query pattern as suspicious), and what tuning process minimizes disruption for legitimate DBA and application activity during initial rollout?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
A false positive with automated response (blocking a legitimate query) can cause real application disruption — ask for a real, customer-validated false-positive figure and a safe rollout-tuning process.
RFPHow consistent is monitoring depth across a multi-cloud/hybrid database environment — is coverage equally deep across on-prem, AWS RDS, Azure SQL, and GCP Cloud SQL, or meaningfully shallower for one environment?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Ask for an honest per-environment coverage breakdown; uneven database monitoring coverage across environments is a common real gap a vendor should disclose rather than obscure.
RFIWhat is a customer-referenced onboarding timeline from contract signature to the platform providing genuinely useful, tuned monitoring across an existing, large database estate with no prior DAM coverage, and what customer-side effort does that require?Answer key — what a strong answer shows
Strong answers give a concrete, customer-validated timeline for a realistic existing-estate retrofit scenario (not a small greenfield deployment), and are honest about the customer-side effort required.
RFPVendor should have a tool capable of monitoring, detecting and managing incidents for database security events (access to sensitive/PII data, database logins with client IP/server IP/source program info, admin command auditing) and IT infrastructure security events (buffer overflow, port/vulnerability scans, password cracking, worm/virus outbreak, unauthorized firewall rule changes, SQL injection, XSS, layer 7 web attacks) via integration with the WAF/Firewall solution deployed at the financial institution.
RFPDevelop an Application Security Policy; develop source control policy and procedures; develop database access security and procedures; review current application implementation (release management) procedures and provide recommendations.
RFPAnalyze the organization's databases to check for updated patches and versions, weak passwords, configuration errors, access control list (ACL) issues, etc.
RFPDemonstrate configuration, support, and architectural design experience with AppDynamics, Azure Application Insight, HP Fortify, F5 Web Application Firewall, Checkpoint Next-Generation Firewalls, Microsoft SQL databases, and cloud/hybrid/on-premise application platforms in an enterprise environment.
